1980 Austin Maxi vs. 1958 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1980 Austin Maxi is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Austin Maxi (69 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1958 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Austin Maxi should accelerate faster than 1958 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Jeep CJ weights approximately 50 kg more than 1980 Austin Maxi.
Because 1958 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Austin Maxi. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Jeep CJ (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Maxi. (105 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1958 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Maxi.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Maxi | 1958 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | Maxi | CJ |
Year Released | 1980 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1485 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 69 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2060 mm |