1980 Austin Maxi vs. 1962 DKW Munga
To start off, 1980 Austin Maxi is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,748 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Austin Maxi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Austin Maxi (72 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Austin Maxi should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 DKW Munga weights approximately 126 kg more than 1980 Austin Maxi.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Austin Maxi. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Maxi | 1962 DKW Munga | |
Make | Austin | DKW |
Model | Maxi | Munga |
Year Released | 1980 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1748 cc | 979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.8 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 984 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 31 L |