1980 Austin Maxi vs. 1963 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1980 Austin Maxi is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac DeVille (197 HP) has 125 more horse power than 1980 Austin Maxi. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Maxi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1158 kg more than 1980 Austin Maxi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Maxi | 1963 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | Maxi | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1748 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 197 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 984 kg | 2142 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2050 mm |
