1980 Austin Maxi vs. 1968 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1980 Austin Maxi is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Nissan Cedric (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1980 Austin Maxi. (69 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Maxi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 346 kg more than 1980 Austin Maxi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Nissan Cedric (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Maxi. (105 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1968 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Maxi.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Maxi | 1968 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Maxi | Cedric |
Year Released | 1980 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1485 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 69 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2700 mm |