1980 Austin Maxi vs. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 2,843 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1980 Austin Maxi. (72 HP @ 4900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Maxi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 166 kg more than 1980 Austin Maxi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Maxi | 1983 Cadillac Cimarron | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | Maxi | Cimarron |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1748 cc | 2843 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 984 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2580 mm |
