1980 Austin Maxi vs. 1985 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1985 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1985 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 966 kg more than 1980 Austin Maxi.
Because 1985 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Maxi | 1985 Cadillac Brougham | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | Maxi | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1748 cc | 5032 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 984 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3090 mm |
