1980 Austin Maxi vs. 1986 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1980 Austin Maxi. (69 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Maxi.
Because 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Maxi. (105 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1986 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Maxi.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Maxi | 1986 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | Maxi | Camaro |
Year Released | 1980 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1485 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 69 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2580 mm |