1980 Austin Maxi vs. 1995 Chrysler Concorde
To start off, 1995 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 3,299 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 575 kg more than 1980 Austin Maxi.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Chrysler Concorde has automatic transmission and 1980 Austin Maxi has manual transmission. 1980 Austin Maxi will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Chrysler Concorde will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Maxi | 1995 Chrysler Concorde | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | Maxi | Concorde |
Year Released | 1980 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1747 cc | 3299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2880 mm |