1980 Austin Maxi vs. 1999 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 1,485 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Austin Maxi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mitsubishi Colt (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1980 Austin Maxi. (69 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Maxi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Austin Maxi weights approximately 35 kg more than 1999 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mitsubishi Colt (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Maxi. (105 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1999 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Maxi.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Maxi | 1999 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | Maxi | Colt |
Year Released | 1980 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1485 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 69 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2430 mm |