1980 Austin Maxi vs. 2000 Proton 400
To start off, 2000 Proton 400 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 1,748 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Austin Maxi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Proton 400 (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1980 Austin Maxi. (72 HP @ 4900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Proton 400 should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Maxi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Proton 400 weights approximately 6 kg more than 1980 Austin Maxi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Austin Maxi (132 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Proton 400. (109 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1980 Austin Maxi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Maxi | 2000 Proton 400 | |
Make | Austin | Proton |
Model | Maxi | 400 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1748 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 132 Nm | 109 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 984 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2510 mm |