1980 Austin Maxi vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1980 Austin Maxi. (91 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Maxi.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Austin Maxi. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Maxi. (141 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Maxi.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Maxi | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Austin | Jeep |
| Model | Maxi | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1747 cc | 3960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 141 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2380 mm |
