1980 Austin Maxi vs. 2004 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2004 Nissan 350Z is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 3,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan 350Z (287 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 1980 Austin Maxi. (72 HP @ 4900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Maxi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan 350Z weights approximately 475 kg more than 1980 Austin Maxi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Nissan 350Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Nissan 350Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan 350Z (372 Nm) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Maxi. (132 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Maxi.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Maxi | 2004 Nissan 350Z | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Maxi | 350Z |
Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1748 cc | 3490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 287 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 132 Nm | 372 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.8 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 984 kg | 1459 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 76 L |