1980 Austin Maxi vs. 2005 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2005 Nissan Almera is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 1,747 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Austin Maxi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Almera (108 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1980 Austin Maxi. (91 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Almera should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Maxi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Almera weights approximately 290 kg more than 1980 Austin Maxi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Austin Maxi (141 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Almera. (138 Nm). This means 1980 Austin Maxi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Almera.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Maxi | 2005 Nissan Almera | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Maxi | Almera |
Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1747 cc | 1597 cc |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 141 Nm | 138 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 60 L |