1980 Austin Maxi vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 541 kg more than 1980 Austin Maxi.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Maxi. (132 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Maxi. 2008 Rover 75 has automatic transmission and 1980 Austin Maxi has manual transmission. 1980 Austin Maxi will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Rover 75 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Maxi | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Austin | Rover |
Model | Maxi | 75 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1748 cc | 2497 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 132 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.8 mm | 82.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 984 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 65 L |