1980 Austin Maxi vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 2,986 cc, 2008 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 728 kg more than 1980 Austin Maxi.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Austin Maxi. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Condor (192 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Maxi. (132 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Maxi.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Maxi | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | Maxi | Condor |
Year Released | 1980 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1748 cc | 2986 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 132 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 99.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.8 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 22.2:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 984 kg | 1712 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 70 L |