1980 Austin Maxi vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1980 Austin Maxi. (91 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Maxi.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Austin Maxi. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Maxi. (141 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Maxi.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Maxi | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | Maxi | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1747 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 141 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 180 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.8 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3010 mm |