1980 Austin Maxi vs. 2009 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2009 Nissan Pixo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 1,748 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Austin Maxi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Austin Maxi (72 HP) has 4 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Austin Maxi should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Pixo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Maxi | 2009 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | Maxi | Pixo |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1748 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 68 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2360 mm |
