1980 Austin Maxi vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 1,748 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Austin Maxi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1980 Austin Maxi. (72 HP @ 4900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Maxi.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (145 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Maxi. (132 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Maxi.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Maxi | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | Maxi | 3 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1748 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 132 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 55 L |