1980 Austin Maxi vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 1,748 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Austin Maxi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1980 Austin Maxi. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Maxi.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Austin Maxi (132 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1980 Austin Maxi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Maxi | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | Maxi | Micra |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1748 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 132 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2449 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 46 L |
