1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1949 Citroen 11
To start off, 1980 Austin Mini Metro is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 1,911 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Citroen 11 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Citroen 11 (55 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (45 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Citroen 11 should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Citroen 11 weights approximately 373 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 1949 Citroen 11 | |
Make | Austin | Citroen |
Model | Mini Metro | 11 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1911 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 747 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3100 mm |