1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1949 Maserati A6GCS
To start off, 1980 Austin Mini Metro is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 1,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Maserati A6GCS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Maserati A6GCS (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Maserati A6GCS should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Austin Mini Metro weights approximately 134 kg more than 1949 Maserati A6GCS.
Because 1949 Maserati A6GCS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Maserati A6GCS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 1949 Maserati A6GCS | |
Make | Austin | Maserati |
Model | Mini Metro | A6GCS |
Year Released | 1980 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 620 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2320 mm |