1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1950 Simca 8
To start off, 1980 Austin Mini Metro is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Simca 8 would be higher. At 1,257 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Austin Mini Metro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Simca 8 weights approximately 126 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Because 1950 Simca 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Simca 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Mini Metro | 1950 Simca 8 | |
| Make | Austin | Simca |
| Model | Mini Metro | 8 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1257 cc | 1220 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2430 mm |
