1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1951 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1980 Austin Mini Metro is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Cadillac 62 (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 998 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 326 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 1951 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Mini Metro | 62 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 5422 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 97 Nm | 423 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.7 mm | 96.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 92.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 6.7:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 1752 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 5480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3210 mm |