1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1952 Bentley R Type Continental
To start off, 1980 Austin Mini Metro is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bentley R Type Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bentley R Type Continental would be higher. At 4,566 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Bentley R Type Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Bentley R Type Continental weights approximately 904 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Because 1952 Bentley R Type Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Bentley R Type Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Mini Metro | 1952 Bentley R Type Continental | |
| Make | Austin | Bentley |
| Model | Mini Metro | R Type Continental |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 4566 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 45 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 747 kg | 1651 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 5250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 81 L |
