1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1980 Austin Mini Metro is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 546 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Because 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Austin | Studebaker |
Model | Mini Metro | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 1980 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2980 mm |