1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1962 Volkswagen Beetle
To start off, 1980 Austin Mini Metro is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volkswagen Beetle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volkswagen Beetle would be higher. At 1,129 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Volkswagen Beetle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Austin Mini Metro (45 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1962 Volkswagen Beetle. (24 HP @ 3300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro should accelerate faster than 1962 Volkswagen Beetle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Volkswagen Beetle weights approximately 13 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Mini Metro | 1962 Volkswagen Beetle | |
| Make | Austin | Volkswagen |
| Model | Mini Metro | Beetle |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 1129 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 45 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 747 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 40 L |
