1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1964 MG 1100
To start off, 1980 Austin Mini Metro is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 MG 1100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 MG 1100 (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (45 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 MG 1100 should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 MG 1100 weights approximately 78 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 MG 1100 (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (73 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1964 MG 1100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 1964 MG 1100 | |
Make | Austin | MG |
Model | Mini Metro | 1100 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 73 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 747 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2380 mm |