1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1964 Toyota Crown
To start off, 1980 Austin Mini Metro is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 1,837 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Toyota Crown (80 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Toyota Crown should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Toyota Crown weights approximately 501 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Toyota Crown (145 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1964 Toyota Crown will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Mini Metro | 1964 Toyota Crown | |
| Make | Austin | Toyota |
| Model | Mini Metro | Crown |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1257 cc | 1837 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 80 HP |
| Torque | 97 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 70.7 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 22.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 61 L |
