1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1980 Austin Mini Metro is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 416 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1964 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Austin | Triumph |
Model | Mini Metro | 2000 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 97 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.7 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 64 L |