1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite
To start off, 1980 Austin Mini Metro is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite weights approximately 433 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Because 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | |
Make | Austin | Austin-Healey |
Model | Mini Metro | Sprite |
Year Released | 1980 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 747 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 3490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1350 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 27 L |