1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1966 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 1980 Austin Mini Metro is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Plymouth Valiant (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Plymouth Valiant should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Because 1966 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 1966 Plymouth Valiant | |
Make | Austin | Plymouth |
Model | Mini Metro | Valiant |
Year Released | 1980 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 2789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2700 mm |