1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1967 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 1980 Austin Mini Metro is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Pontiac Firebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Pontiac Firebird would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Pontiac Firebird (285 HP) has 223 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Pontiac Firebird should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Pontiac Firebird weights approximately 906 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Pontiac Firebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Pontiac Firebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 1967 Pontiac Firebird | |
Make | Austin | Pontiac |
Model | Mini Metro | Firebird |
Year Released | 1980 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 285 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2750 mm |