1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1969 BMW 2000
To start off, 1980 Austin Mini Metro is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 BMW 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 BMW 2000 weights approximately 346 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Because 1969 BMW 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 BMW 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Mini Metro | 1969 BMW 2000 | |
| Make | Austin | BMW |
| Model | Mini Metro | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1257 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |
