1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1971 Zastava 1300

To start off, 1980 Austin Mini Metro is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Zastava 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Zastava 1300 (53 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (45 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Zastava 1300 should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 233 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1971 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Zastava 1300 (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (73 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1971 Zastava 1300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.

Compare all specifications: