1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1972 Ford Cortina
To start off, 1980 Austin Mini Metro is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Ford Cortina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Austin Mini Metro (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1972 Ford Cortina. (56 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro should accelerate faster than 1972 Ford Cortina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Ford Cortina weights approximately 290 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Because 1972 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Austin Mini Metro (97 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford Cortina. (91 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1980 Austin Mini Metro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 1972 Ford Cortina | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Mini Metro | Cortina |
Year Released | 1980 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 97 Nm | 91 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.7 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 63 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 1044 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 87 L |