1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1975 BMW 1602
To start off, 1980 Austin Mini Metro is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 BMW 1602. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 BMW 1602 would be higher. At 1,574 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 BMW 1602 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 BMW 1602 (85 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (45 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 BMW 1602 should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 BMW 1602 weights approximately 183 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1975 BMW 1602 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 BMW 1602. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 BMW 1602 (130 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (73 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1975 BMW 1602 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 1975 BMW 1602 | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | Mini Metro | 1602 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1574 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 73 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 8.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 747 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 50 L |