1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1976 Volvo 66

To start off, 1980 Austin Mini Metro is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,257 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Austin Mini Metro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Austin Mini Metro (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Volvo 66 weights approximately 66 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.

Because 1976 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1976 Volvo 66 has automatic transmission and 1980 Austin Mini Metro has manual transmission. 1980 Austin Mini Metro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1976 Volvo 66 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: