1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1977 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1980 Austin Mini Metro is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,031 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1203 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Because 1977 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 1977 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Mini Metro | Brougham |
Year Released | 1980 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 5031 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 747 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3090 mm |