1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1982 BMW 316
To start off, 1982 BMW 316 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 1,573 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 BMW 316 (89 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (45 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Because 1982 BMW 316 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 BMW 316. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Mini Metro | 1982 BMW 316 | |
| Make | Austin | BMW |
| Model | Mini Metro | 316 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 1573 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 45 HP | 89 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 55 L |
