1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1984 Talbot 1510

To start off, 1984 Talbot 1510 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 1,905 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Talbot 1510 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Talbot 1510 (63 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Talbot 1510 should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Talbot 1510 weights approximately 326 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Talbot 1510 (120 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1984 Talbot 1510 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.

Compare all specifications:

1980 Austin Mini Metro 1984 Talbot 1510
Make Austin Talbot
Model Mini Metro 1510
Year Released 1980 1984
Engine Size 1257 cc 1905 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 62 HP 63 HP
Torque 97 Nm 120 Nm
Torque RPM 3100 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 754 kg 1080 kg
Vehicle Length 3410 mm 4320 mm
Vehicle Width 1550 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2260 mm 2610 mm