1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1986 Citroen GSA
To start off, 1986 Citroen GSA is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 1,257 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Austin Mini Metro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Austin Mini Metro (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1986 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Citroen GSA weights approximately 171 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Mini Metro | 1986 Citroen GSA | |
| Make | Austin | Citroen |
| Model | Mini Metro | GSA |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1257 cc | 1127 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 925 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 43 L |
