1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1992 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1992 Ford Ranger is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (45 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 1992 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Mini Metro | Ranger |
Year Released | 1980 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 2298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1760 mm |