1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1994 Mazda 626
To start off, 1994 Mazda 626 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda 626 (108 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (45 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mazda 626 weights approximately 473 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mazda 626 (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (73 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1994 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 1994 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | Mini Metro | 626 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 73 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 8.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 747 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2620 mm |