1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1996 Mercury Villager
To start off, 1996 Mercury Villager is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (45 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Villager weights approximately 1053 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Mini Metro | 1996 Mercury Villager | |
| Make | Austin | Mercury |
| Model | Mini Metro | Villager |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 2960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 45 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 747 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2860 mm |
