1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1996 Toyota Conquest
To start off, 1996 Toyota Conquest is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 1,973 cc, 1996 Toyota Conquest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota Conquest (174 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Conquest should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota Conquest weights approximately 362 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Toyota Conquest (135 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm). This means 1996 Toyota Conquest will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 1996 Toyota Conquest | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | Mini Metro | Conquest |
Year Released | 1980 | 1996 |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 1973 cc |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 174 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 97 Nm | 135 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 1116 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2740 mm |