1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 1,257 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Austin Mini Metro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Austin Mini Metro (62 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Austin Mini Metro weights approximately 104 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 1997 MCC Smart | |
Make | Austin | MCC |
Model | Mini Metro | Smart |
Year Released | 1980 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 53 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1460 mm |