1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 1999 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1999 Mazda Midge is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda Midge weights approximately 212 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mazda Midge (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1999 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 1999 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | Mini Metro | Midge |
Year Released | 1980 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 97 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |