1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2000 Dodge Viper
To start off, 2000 Dodge Viper is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 7,990 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Dodge Viper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Dodge Viper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Viper (1,154 Nm) has 1057 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2000 Dodge Viper | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | Mini Metro | Viper |
Year Released | 1980 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 7990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 97 Nm | 1154 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 70.7 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 98.8 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2450 mm |