1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2000 Isuzu Kai
To start off, 2000 Isuzu Kai is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Isuzu Kai is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Isuzu Kai is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Isuzu Kai will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Isuzu Kai has automatic transmission and 1980 Austin Mini Metro has manual transmission. 1980 Austin Mini Metro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Isuzu Kai will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2000 Isuzu Kai | |
Make | Austin | Isuzu |
Model | Mini Metro | Kai |
Year Released | 1980 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 3001 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2700 mm |