1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2000 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 2000 Mahindra Armada is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mahindra Armada (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1246 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2000 Mahindra Armada | |
| Make | Austin | Mahindra |
| Model | Mini Metro | Armada |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1257 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4310 mm |
